The inevitable saturation of workforce personnel with members of Generation Y – a term afforded to individuals born in the 1980′s – is demanding a general change in practice for most businesses. Outsourcing strategies are no exception to this rule. According to a recent article on ComputerWeekly.com, in which the author analyzed research done by Gartner‘s professional data-miners, “by 2025, 75% of the average businesses workforce will be made up of this group of people.”
One of the most interesting aspects of Gartner’s findings spoke of a reversal of the “not invented here” syndrome – that is, that the majority of Generation Y first seeks an already existing IT solution for any given task, as opposed to the current/dated option of businesses creating their own IT services. “Generation Y looks first into what is available on the market before deciding to build anything, especially with highly commoditised services,” Gartner claims. Being a member of Generation Y, my own personal preferences further support this claim, as I would definitely prefer to utilize an already existing IT product from the market, rather than create one entirely from scratch.
I believe this logic derives directly from Generation Y’s elaborate connection to (and dependence on) technology. The vast majority of us are at least basically familiar with the ins-and-outs of computer use, due to the constant, early exposure to computing technology in our every-day lives. Given the fluctuating nature of this type technology – the recurrent need for upgrades, the consistent changes in basic functionality of programs – Generation Y is frequently forced to adjust and to adapt to new user-interfaces, and generally more acceptant of change. Therefore, learning how to use already-existing software comes as second-nature to us, as it was an integral part of our computing experience since the beginning.
Another one of the more interesting findings from Gartner’s research is that ”the demand for speed is much higher with today’s impatient Generation Y workers.” I won’t deny that the timely completion of any work related task is important, but I was under the impression that this concept spans all generations, and would be interested in learning the specific data collection methods utilized in drawing this conclusion. What do you think?
Source 2) http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=2413415












Things to Remember About Adopting New Purchasing Systems
In today’s business world, there is a gap between actualizing an effective purchasing automation system, and those that fall short of their great expectations. So how do you ensure that your business doesn’t fall into the latter category? How do you keep your procurement plans from becoming delusions of grandeur? Spendmatters.com recently posted six insider tips that may help shed some light on how to ensure a successful implementation of your company’s purchasing automation system.
Amongst some of the more self-explanatory tips (like #1: Begin with the end in mind, and #6: Stick with it), the second and forth tips peeked my attention. #2 read: “Don’t be afraid of a little discomfort.” This is an important tip, as a functional procurement system may initially seem like it’s drawing attention to all the ugly parts of a company’s spending habits; singling out all the mistakes or shortcomings of coworkers. But that just mean that the system is doing its job correctly. It is supposed to point out all the flaws and misgivings of your company’s current purchasing processes, and in order to clean out the cobwebs, it must first bring them to light.
This works in accordance with the next one I found most interesting. #4 stated: “Use the system as a way to strengthen purchasing relationships.” Further in the explanation, the post read: “Standardizing purchasing via automation is not about good guys vs. bad guys. It’s about gaining visibility into the company’s buying activities to produce a more intelligent and profitable supply chain for everyone.” I think this is an important concept to keep in mind while considering the content of #2 – that at the end of the day you are all on the same side. Procurement isn’t just about cutting cost, ie – getting the cheapest items when sacrificing quality. It’s about optimizing purchasing, so both the purchasing department and those utilizing what was purchased are satisfied. For the rest of the list, click here.
Source: http://spendmatters.com/2013/04/18/6-insider-tips-for-getting-a-purchasing-system-off-the-ground/